NEW PROSTATE CANCER INFO-LINK: An article developed by HealthDay for U.S. News & World Report carries the headline “A ‘Smart Bomb’ for Prostate Cancer?” The question mark at the end was a good idea, because it is clear to even a half-awake reader that the supposed smart bomb isn’t so smart at all. READ MORE>
DEBUNK: So-called ’smart bomb for prostate cancer’ not so clever after all
April 23, 2009 by Jim Tucker
Posted in PROSTATE CANCER, PROSTATE RESEARCH, Prostate claims, Treatment debate, Treatment news | Tagged cancer research, prostablog, prostate, prostate blog, PROSTATE CANCER, prostate cancer treatments, prostate treatment debate, smart bomb, US News & World report | No Comments Yet
Leave a Reply
MY PROSTATE STORY
Prostate Cancer Foundation of NZ
Prostate inquiry
Prostate websites
PROSTABLOG pages
Stories posted so far
StatCounter
Prostablog RSS – click here-
COMMENTS
Ants Parder on NZ Guidelines Group 2009 cance… Mike Demarco on NZ Guidelines Group 2009 cance… Leslie Mutchler on READER’S DIGEST screenin… juan perez on PROSTATE BIOPSY: Study looks a… Sandy on Gleason score 6 for prostate c… TOPICS
- AFTER EFFECTS (148)
- Biochemical recurrence (45)
- Bone loss (18)
- Bowel (1)
- Depression (3)
- Erectile function (42)
- Incontinence (25)
- Shorter penis (1)
- ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES (68)
- Dietary intervention (33)
- Magnolia (1)
- Natural remedies (34)
- Omega 3 fatty acids (3)
- Pomegranate (2)
- Soy (7)
- Vitamin A (1)
- Vitamin B (2)
- Vitamin D (6)
- Vitamin E (2)
- AWARENESS and MEDIA (115)
- Books (2)
- Facebook (1)
- Good news recovery stories (13)
- NZ Media coverage (4)
- Prostate blogs (23)
- Prostate claims (32)
- Prostate media coverage (25)
- Prostate myths (9)
- Prostate polls (2)
- Prostate stories (19)
- Translating medical terms (1)
- Wives' stories (5)
- ETHNICITY (15)
- Maori mortality (7)
- FUND RAISING (74)
- Blue September (21)
- Movember (3)
- Rowing 4 Prostate (31)
- FUTURE PROSPECTS (4)
- METASTASIS (9)
- Bone cancer (8)
- NZ Prostate Cancer Foundation (7)
- OFFICIAL BODIES (49)
- PROSTATE CANCER (1135)
- Coming out (7)
- PC general (1)
- Young patients (3)
- PROSTATE RESEARCH (749)
- PROSTATE RISKS (154)
- Age factors (9)
- Agent orange risk (1)
- Alcohol (3)
- Avoidance (29)
- Calcium (3)
- DNA damage (1)
- Folic acid (10)
- Obesity (6)
- Red meat (3)
- Selenium (2)
- Smoking (2)
- Socio-economic status (3)
- Virus (2)
- SCREENING and DIAGNOSIS (391)
- Biomarkers (16)
- Biopsy (32)
- Cancer aggression (7)
- Checkups (51)
- Diagnosis (104)
- Digital exams (5)
- Doctors' advice (32)
- Family history (2)
- Feedback (2)
- Gene fusion (2)
- Genetic testing (11)
- Gleason grade (15)
- Mis-diagnosis (3)
- MRI scans (1)
- New tests (25)
- Prostate advice (13)
- Prostate prognosis (31)
- PSA tests (187)
- Screening debate (213)
- Urine test (7)
- Vaccines (3)
- SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY (19)
- SYMPTOMS (19)
- Enlarged prostate (5)
- Urination (15)
- TREATMENT (577)
- Brachytherapy (39)
- Castration (1)
- Catheters (12)
- Chemotherapy (23)
- Cryoablation (5)
- Cryotherapy (3)
- Gene therapy (3)
- Hormone therapy (62)
- Hormone-refactory (19)
- Immunotherapy (7)
- Killer genes (1)
- Medical tourism (1)
- MRI (2)
- New prostate drugs (43)
- Over-treatment (2)
- Post-operative care (17)
- Prostate cancer recovery (17)
- Prostate drugs (20)
- Prostate massage (1)
- Proton therapy (9)
- Provenge (16)
- Radical prostatectomy (103)
- Radio surgery (5)
- Radiotherapy (68)
- Robotic surgery (5)
- Salvage therapy (7)
- Survival (22)
- Testosterone treatment (25)
- TomoTherapy (1)
- Trans-urethral re-section (1)
- Treatment cost (1)
- Treatment debate (183)
- Treatment news (298)
- Ultrasound (7)
- Watchful waiting (21)
- Uncategorized (21)
- AFTER EFFECTS (148)
-
Jim's Flickr photos










More Photos