October 22, 2009 by Jim Tucker
BUZZ MACHINE: The debate over whether there should be screening for prostate and breast cancer is way off beam, writes media blogger Jeff Jarvis. READ MORE>
This isn’t about me and my cancer. This is about statistics and money.
The question they’re asking: Is it worth it to find these cancers and cut them out at considerable cost if we’re not sure those cancers would have killed all those people who had surgery?
But who’s to say what’s worth it?
| mesothelioma on If Obama introduces ‘med… | |
| Van L Sledge on Balanced account of PSA debate… | |
| what causes pancreat… on PROSTATE INQUIRY | |
| chelsea crowe on MARY and JOHN’S sto… | |
| dota 2 beta key lott… on BLUE September 2009 | |
| dota 2 beta key lott… on Throaty roar signals start of… | |
| Edward WIlson on MY CANCER STORY | |
| piet on PROSTATE INQUIRY | |
| Craig Johnson on MY CANCER STORY | |
| Patty on Prostablog back on line… | |
| Arleen on MY CANCER STORY | |
| Ray Hall on MARY and JOHN’S sto… | |
| Doyle Rolstad on PROSTATE POLL: Here’s yo… | |
| Commander Data on MARY and JOHN’S sto… | |
| steve marston on MARY and JOHN’S sto… |
Prostablog RSS – click here
|
